

Dear concerned,
At the moment I am in Lome Togo, the capital city of a small French
speaking country in West Africa. I found a great place to stay called
Veronica Guest House at $55/night and am enjoying the culture
here. Yesterday I walked by the U.S. Ambassador's residence and paused
ever so briefly to study the plaque on the wall surrounding the yard. Two Togo soldiers
immediately approached me inquiring in French and English what I wanted. I
pulled out my passport and mumbled something about being an American and
walked on.
I hadn't gone more than ten meters before one of the guards shouted in
a commanding voice for me to stop. I usually ignore people who shout at me, but these
uniformed guys
had guns and I stopped. My passport cover didn't satisfy them. The guy
with poor English grabbed it and inspected every page of the now thick
book, pausing occasionally to ask me inane questions like "What kind
of beer do you like?" The two played "good cop... bad cop"
while they convinced themselves they had stopped no one more sinister than
a curious American tourist.
Later that same day I tracked down the American Embassy located
adjacent to the bustling people's market. Learning I had chosen Columbus
Day to drop by with the consulate closed, I questioned the sentries on
issues related to my personal safety. At first they were helpful and
polite, but as our conversation drug on an officer materialized and put
an end to this frivolous distraction. It is clear that security people
here are taking the worldwide threat to American interests very seriously.
Today I again visited the embassy and learned most of West Africa has seen
none of the protests and threats against American interests being reported
in other parts of the world. I met the ambassador briefly while there;
young guy, very personable.
Other people here, including several Muslims have confirmed there are no
significant anti-American sentiments being expressed in this part of West
Africa. The tiny minority of Muslims quietly practice their faith openly
on the streets five times each day. As a prayer time approaches, groups of
10 to 20 unfold cardboard pieces and cover a designated place on the
sidewalk for their public devotion. Bottles of water serve the proscribed
curbside ritual washing of hands, feet and faces in preparation for
prayers. I am told there is at least one mosque here, though I haven't yet
found it. An equal number of Catholics live here, but the majority of
people still practice Animism. So, most people fear the ire of ancestors
more than the wrath of gods.
Judging by the number of letters I've received in the last week or so,
I am afraid some of you have the impression that I've been hanging out
with radical Islamic fundamentalists... waving a large American flag in
the middle of anti-American riots. Put it out of your mind. Quite the contrary is true.
Whenever I find myself obviously in the midst of Muslims I switch to
high alert status. However, the only Muslims I've seen have been ordinary
devout people who wouldn't hurt a fly. Each encounter makes me realize how
effective the threat of personal harm can be in molding the behavior of
people. It is not all that different from the pervasive fear of street
crime I've seen in other African countries. The reality is that immediate threats to
my personal safety have been no greater than in most large crowded cities
elsewhere in the world... especially in violent cities like Los Angeles or
New York. My perception of danger however has varied wildly with the
various warnings of eminent dangers offered by "helpful,
concerned" people I encountere.
I've been thinking a lot about the terrible events of 11 September and
now the military actions against those thought to be responsible.
Sometimes I think I understand the reasons for what is happening, but
usually the complexity of the matter leaves me feeling overwhelmed and
helpless. What could be so important that people would willingly sacrifice
their lives to send a message to their enemy, us?
One of my friends pointed out that we need look no further than the
targets chosen for the 11 September attacks to understand their
motivations. While "The medium is the message." not everyone
will hear the message over the roar of self-serving calls for retaliation
and revenge. In the past, organizations with known grievances and agendas
have claimed responsibility for their actions, thus immediately and
unambiguously focusing media attention on the specific grievances
themselves. That didn't happen this time, though I now see many
investigative TV reporters digging into the matter.
I have noticed with relief that our government so far has moved slowly
and carefully with military action... thank god-Allah. It is attempting to
convince the world that the enemy is "terrorism" and not the
religious fundamentalism that drives it. Of course, terrorism like
motherhood is something on which nearly everyone in the civilized world
can agree while religious fundamentalism is often seen as but one of many
legitimate expressions of faith. However, by focusing attention
exclusively on terrorism we run the risk of loosing sight of the fact that
wars are fought over issues and these are being obscured by all the
rhetoric.
Terrorism is after all only a weapon, the only weapon available to many
of the economically oppressed (envious) people of the world. That it
specifically targets "innocent civilians" makes it no worse than
other weapons of war like land mines (which have produced many times more
"innocent" victims than all the acts of terrorism put together).
It is time for us to shift our attention from action to a consideration
of causes. Among these are unwelcome economic exploitation (much
exploitation here in Africa is welcome!) and collusion with third world
corruption (something everyone here in Africa acknowledges is rampant and
widespread). We (the business backed American government) seem more than
willing to work with the devil to improve the bottom line. Such
selfishness is reprehensible... our rejection of the Kyoto Accords is a
naked example that comes immediately to mind. It is time for first world
consumers to think like statesmen: What is best for the world and all of
its inhabitants, what is best for the human family as a whole? Any system
based exclusively on greed and selfishness is savage and speaks poorly of
the human spirit in my mind.
Equally important is the global tolerance of angry bigotry and coercive
fundamentalism. This truly is a scourge of the earth and threatens every
sensible effort to improve the lot of deprived people. Clearly and sadly,
the masses of ordinary people need leading, but none need intellectual
imprisonment! All of these "prisons" must be closed and
dismantled. Those who choose to remain prisoners will do so of course, but
they must be prevented by whatever means necessary from forcing others to
join them there, or from preventing anyone who wishes to escape from doing
so. While the Taliban currently is one of the best examples of
"religious prisons" in the world today, there are others.
American Christians with extremist views have bombed family planning
clinics and assassinated doctors in an attempt to force others to accept
their inflexible religious views. Jewish extremists have used violence to
send messages to Muslims on numerous occasions as well.
Because religious coercion takes so many different forms, often subtle
or covert, guaranteeing true religious freedom will require an
unprecedented level of political will and new ways of looking at the
meaning of religious freedom. With our current problems, moderate Muslims
must be convinced that it is in the best interests of the Islamic faithful
to curtail the violent expressions of the most extreme elements within
their ranks. My moderate Muslim friends in Turkey have told me they do not
disagree, but that the extremists are too politically powerful to
control... even in secular Turkey. A sustained international effort is
needed.
I applaud statements made by former British Prime Minister, Margaret
Thatcher who called for more public condemnation of Islamic extremists by
Muslim leaders in Britain. Moderate religious leaders of every faith must
stand up and shout their convictions that gentle persuasion is the only
acceptable way to bring others to their faiths, that coercion has no
legitimate place in promoting or sustaining their religions.
In the present conflict, no progress is going to be made without
focusing long overdue attention on the Jewish extremists, those
individuals in Israel who flaunt their fundamentalist religious
convictions and insist on shoving them in the faces of Palestinian Muslims
as well as irritating a majority of religiously moderate Jewish citizens
of Israel.
During my exploration of Israel and Palestine in March 1998 I found no
rational justification for continuing to force Palestinians to accept the
presence of Jewish "settlements with their military protection"
in otherwise exclusively Muslim neighborhoods in what has been agreed is
to be the state of Palestine. My first person description of what I
discovered during my visit to Hebron in 1998 is linked here.
Those observations are as relevant today as they were three years ago.
Faith, by its very nature is not rational. I concluded a long time ago
that evolution must have selected for irrational religious belief, that
those early members of the human race who possessed a lot of it had a
better chance of surviving. This conclusion is now supported by recent
research findings. I finally understand that faith is absolutely essential
for human well being... the object of faith is immaterial... the more
preposterous, the better in my view. Convincing others holding different
views that yours is not preposterous is a futile and destructive
enterprise, particularly if it challenges the quality of their own
"preposterous" faith.
The great minds of the world must discover ways of tempering the
actions of those driven by religious zeal to forcefully evangelize or make
their temples prisons. Religious freedom does not give anyone the right to
limit the religious freedom of others. I hope civilization eventually
reaches the point where this will become obvious to everyone.
I spent 8 nights in the capital city of Lome, the first three in a $60
high rise down town, the Palm Beach Hotel. As soon as I discovered the
charming and economical $55 Veronica Guest House with its large modern
rooms and French attention to details, I moved over to it. Be sure to
check out my pictures this time. The Veronica chef cooked delicious meals
that made me want to eat too much; his mixed greens salad with small
banana slices is something I want to try at home.
During one of my walks I paused to talk with the only white guy I'd
seen all day. He turned out to be Jeff Brown, a 28-year-old U.S. Peace
Corps volunteer in his second year of service. He described the village of
about 30 people where he lives and the hut with dirt floor in which he
sleeps. His assigned health education duties are ridiculed so he spends
most of his time digging toilet pits and clearing clogged drainage
ditches. Water for everything is hauled from the river a hundred meters
away, boiled and used sparingly. Weekly, he rides his bicycle 20km into
the nearest town of Dapoang for groceries. The U.S. government pays him about
$150 per month. "Loves it," he says.
The operator of this cyber cafe took pity on me and reminded me I could
change the keyboard in Windows; dumb me; I knew that! Anyway, I touch type
so the key labels with the French layout are no longer a problem.
I am working on my big backlog of pictures and postcards and hope to
get a few out before I leave Togo. We will see. For now,
Peace.
Fred Bellomy 7 October 2001